Human Advantages and Disadvantages

 Human Advantages and Disadvantages

A random act of kindness and love will not soften the cruel nature of people. All this does is prove that we humans have really messed up when it comes to trying to make family and love universal values. These actions are driven by those who may believe that society's rigidity is vulnerable; they also serve as a warning against the avarice of a select few, whose greed is causing the decline of the majority.

People can conduct charitable work, make donations, and start foundations for a variety of reasons, including the desire to become famous or to aid the poor. The inability of humanity to adequately address the vital concerns of universal peace, compassion, love, and pleasure is highlighted by these activities regardless of whether they increase, remain constant, or decrease. Policies and decision-makers should not, above all else, have these pursuits in mind while formulating their goals. Having these values deeply ingrained in a society's culture is essential for promoting moral and social responsibility; otherwise, the society in question lacks the foundational egalitarianism necessary to support these values.

Here we are not referring to humanity as a whole, but rather to subsets of that population that are ensconced in specific locations, or to subsets of the population outside of those locations that assert an inseparable bond to those locations. The transgressions of a culture whose collective unconscious refuses to produce the kind of harmony that may calm a planet in disarray are often brought to the attention of the reflecting individual's conscience. This appears to be a dramatic unfolding, yet it is actually quite real.

An ideological framework built from power sources is the primary source from which group psyche arises, rather than being an inevitable byproduct. Group psyche is much more intricate than collective personality, which is a cultural product. To a greater extent, the ideological framework—consisting of the sources of power's formalization of their own constructed beliefs as cultural truths—is the root cause of group mentality. In order to avoid being revealed as unethical, those in power believe a basic lie and then work tirelessly to spread it to everyone. We should be alarmed by such propaganda because it poses real or perceived danger, causes suffering, torments innocent lives, and encourages chaos at a time when international collaboration and fair regard for cultural differences are most desired.

Is it possible that we fail to see ideological constructs that are presented as indisputable facts, as essential to the democratic process, when in reality, all they offer are cultural misconceptions derived from an imperialistic past? False information spreads rapidly over the globe, thanks to the talented propagandists. Behind their schemes is an inescapable desire to dominate other cultures, and they don't even realize it—or better yet, they understand it—that our self-proclaimed culture disagrees with their cultural misconceptions. They dress up their lies as "liberty," "democracy," "civilization," "development," "progress," and so on. We have repeatedly overlooked culture's inherent nature as it emerges from people's ongoing interaction with the unique natural setting in which they find themselves. Give this some thought.

In terms of all characteristics that are considered natural, two environmental spaces, p and q, are distinct from one another. Concerns with weather, vegetation, and wildlife immediately spring to mind as examples of their uniqueness. P and q societies are thus named because its members have actively worked to improve their environments from ancient times to the current day. Furthermore, these societies have developed political, religious, economic, and social institutions in response to the difficulties they faced as a result of their settings. Whether or not this qualifies as modern depends on our subjective definition of modernity. The entire plan is based on human needs that are met in response to the specific environmental circumstances of every given moment. However, in various places around the world, we may see flaws and human wrongdoing. In the end, it is the balancing acts of the environment and group psyche that will solve this mystery within mankind.

We should not interfere with the natural order of things because just as environmental spaces are unique, so are cultural forms. When we accept cultural forms that are shaped by our surroundings as inevitable, as if they were a divine arrangement, we are more likely to dismiss the efforts of imperial powers who want to destroy other cultures and replace them with their own. If this were to happen, culture would no longer be moving in its regular symbiotic trajectory, and a new, chaotic trajectory would instead meet the environment head-on.

But this form of instability not only introduces a web of confusion to the individual and collective psyches, but it also disrupts the relationship between the new humanity and the environmental space. Judgement of other cultures in an absolute sense based on markers of one's own culture is a mistake and a manifest failure. No culture or people should have their destiny dictated by the abnormal beliefs and behaviors of one group. Proliferation of human depravities and cultural form distortion are possible outcomes of not eliminating this aberration. However, this is what is often misunderstood as advancement, civilisation, liberty, democracy, and so on.

Supporters, members of its uncritical social group, and ignorant admirers have been influenced by new psychological impulses brought about by superpower politics and economics. The architect had us believe that the collective guilt was the genuine spirit of civilization, and we abandoned the pursuit of truth in favor of that. Inverting a social group's guilt and presenting it as a liberated conscience that others should follow is both immoral and harmful to humanity. This kind of guilt stems from a society that values independence and autonomy above all else, frequently at the expense of community and environmental harmony. A mechanical human would be one who has abandoned the ideal of religious absorption in favor of conquering rather than embracing their natural surroundings. But many people see this, erroneously, as the new genuine human being, the embodiment of their own unique personality.

Avoid viewing one's own identity as a theoretical, nebulous concept. Much of what makes us unique, both you and I, is our cultural background. The fact that I was born and raised in a different cultural milieu than yours gives rise to my unique personality traits, which in turn reflect my internal and external responses. Culture boils down to this. Cultural differences are relative, not absolute, and this fact brings us together as human beings despite our many distinctions. However, we run the risk of ignoring the importance of one's cultural background when we treat personal identity as a theoretical construct. On the surface, imperialist policies and procedures seem to be based on the nebulous concept of individual identity.

Oh my goodness!

Location:

Share :